Union of India or United States of India? A Tamil word used by DMK sparks a debate

Union of India or United States of India? A Tamil word used by DMK sparks a debate

Recently, DMK leaders and IT departments have begun to use Tamil as the term for “central government.” BJP’s online warriors were noticed, quickly offended, and a modest war broke out on Twitter.

His DMK, an advocate of state rights, emphasized the importance of state rights and rights with the intention to do so with this coin, triggered by the position of the prime minister as a whole. Historically, the Democratic Government has her. It falls into two categories: single government and federal government. Federal governments like the United States need a clear constitution, a clear portfolio of federal and state governments, and a Supreme Court with the authority to resolve disputes between them.

A single government, such as the Soviet Union or France, has a strong central government and few state and local governments. The federal government cannot dissolve the state government, but only one government is free to dissolve the state government. Therefore, we can safely conclude that India is a single government with federal characteristics. In short, India is an intriguing, but strictly simple, single government.

Indian rule or Indian US?

Onryam is a Tamil word that roughly refers to the federal government, not the central government. But something is missing in the translation. In fact, the Tamil word “onrim” does not refer to the federal government, but generally to a single government.

As a result, DMK made a mistake in referencing the federal government using Onriyam (Shampoo Type Matched La Vida Progress). But the immediate problem is broader than the holy war for DMK and its state rights. How do Indian states see themselves and the formation of India? In the United States, 13 states merged to form a federal government with a small number of powers and a powerful state with the remaining powers.

After independence, British India was divided into her 14 states and 365 princely states, divided into India and Pakistan. Saldar Vallabhbhai Patel and Krishnamenon have created a unified certificate. Called “tools of accession,” they approached 365 sovereign states individually and annexed them one by one. Therefore, historically India was born as a single government. To

After independence, Indian politicians felt the need for a strong center to integrate many cultures, languages ​​and customs. However, the abolition of the princely state and the formation of a linguistic state changed India’s politics forever. In this spirit, India must reinvent itself as a one-style “Indian Union” or the federalist “United States of India” and ask itself whether it should reinvent itself.

Abolition of the governor and Article 356

Today’s Indian-speaking countries are anxious for autonomy. The days when the state was afraid of the mere expression of Article 356 are gone. His Patriarch Anadurai’s motto at DMK is “Why goats need goats and why states need governors?” It still resonates with the Indian people.

When the governor is breathing steadily around the CM’s neck, the condition feels poor and exorbitant. When discussing Article 356 in my “Indian Constitution” class, one of the students (a 2K boy) was confused and asked. “”

Gen Z hopes, at least, that our politicians will stop “riding the helicopter” of the governor. You must either abolish the governor’s position or elect it in a direct election by state voters. In addition, Article 356 is used as a political weapon and should be abolished. The central government can use Article 355 to dispatch troops in the event of an unforeseen event without the dissolution of the legislature.

State, not state

The linguistically divided Indian states should be recognized and treated as full-fledged states, not just states. This strengthens the Indian state as a true coalition of mutual respect and equal stakeholders. The Constitution of India explicitly denies the state’s right to victory in a coalition and we have a strong army. Therefore, there is no reason to be afraid of the consequences. Moreover, the succession movement has not gained momentum in Indian politics.

Many want India to be an independent state, but no state wants to separate from India. During the election, we listened to Tam.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: